Which committee is focused on addressing situational demands rather than ongoing duties?

The choice of an ad hoc committee is appropriate because such committees are specifically formed to address particular issues or tasks that arise, often on a temporary basis. This situational responsiveness is their defining characteristic, as they disband after achieving their assigned goal.

In contrast, an executive committee typically has ongoing duties related to the management and direction of an organization and handles regular operational matters. A standing committee also has continuing responsibilities, often focusing on specific areas of governance or operations over a longer period. Meanwhile, a planning committee, while it may set the direction for the future, is usually engaged in ongoing planning activities rather than addressing specific situational demands.

The nature of an ad hoc committee makes it a flexible and effective solution for addressing immediate challenges, allowing organizations to be responsive and adaptable to changing circumstances.