What belief does Kent hold regarding rules?

Kent's belief that "rules must be obeyed irrespective of consequences" signifies a strict adherence to regulations and standards without exception. This perspective emphasizes the importance of consistency, order, and integrity in following established protocols. It suggests that the rules are in place for a reason, and bypassing them could lead to negative outcomes, undermining the principles on which they were founded.

This belief system is often seen in environments where compliance and accountability are paramount, such as in regulatory frameworks, legal systems, or organizations that prioritize ethical standards. By advocating for unwavering obedience to rules, Kent highlights the idea that rules are fundamental to maintaining structure and preventing chaos, regardless of individual circumstances or outcomes that may arise from following them.

In contrast to this belief, the other options reflect a more flexible or dismissive approach to rules. Some might argue for ignoring rules entirely, only following them when convenient, or restricting their application to a specific group, which does not align with the notion of universal adherence that Kent supports. This distinction sets Kent's belief apart as one that values unwavering commitment to rules as a cornerstone of principled behavior.