True or False: Personal factors such as extensive authority result in weaker or less controlled managers.

The statement that personal factors such as extensive authority result in weaker or less controlled managers can be analyzed in terms of how authority impacts managerial behavior and effectiveness.

Managers with extensive authority often possess greater autonomy in decision-making processes. While this can foster a sense of empowerment and enable quick decision-making, it can also lead to challenges in oversight and control. When managers are granted significant power without adequate checks and balances, there’s a risk that they might act in ways that are not aligned with the organization’s goals or ethical standards. This situation can lead to weaker management if the authority is not accompanied by accountability.

Additionally, extensive authority without proper controls may result in less structured management practices. Managers may overlook protocols, leading to inconsistencies in how operations are managed, which can ultimately weaken overall organizational effectiveness. Hence, in such scenarios, personal factors including how authority is wielded can indeed contribute to a perception of weaker management.

In contrast, managers who operate within a system of checks and balances, regardless of the extent of their authority, are generally seen as more effective and accountable. Therefore, authority without appropriate boundaries can lead to less controlled managerial practices, supporting the notion that personal factors like extensive authority may result in weaker or less controlled managers.